Melrose & Ebor Trends Selections

Melrose & Ebor Trends Selections

This Saturday 24th August, sees a couple of cracking handicaps in the Melrose and Ebor. Trends analysis is an excellent way to narrow down the field and can give additional strength behind selections used via a ratings, or alternative, method.

Thankfully, GeeGeez publishes trends for all the big-races and using GeeGeez Gold, you can really narrow down qualifiers, or rather rule out non-qualifiers, much easier and quicker. These two races took me 10 minutes.

MELROSE HANDICAP

One of the strongest trends is that 14 of the 16 winners had not raced at York before and 14 of 16 also had 4 or more runs that season. 

The next strongest trends are 12/16 which are “Won carrying 9-0 or less”, “Had won over 12f or further” and “Had a Top-5 finish last time out”. 

The only real strong'ish trend that remains is 10/16 were drawn in stall 8 or lower. 

Those trends get us down to just 2 qualifiers, JUST HUBERT 16/1 and LAND OF OZ 10/1 so take your pick from that pair. I'll probably go with the one that is highest on my ratings for the race, which are already available to subscribers – you can join today here, and get access to all Saturday's rated races.

EBOR HANDICAP

I've backed some great winners of this race over the years, some from trends analysis, most from ratings and this year I'm pretty confident with the FTS ratings and trends combination to have a couple of chances of finding the winner.

We start with the 2 strongest trends 16/17 “Carried 9-4 or less” and were “Aged 6 or younger”. Amazingly, that leaves us with 6 from the potential 24-strong field. 

We then look at the next strongest trends, 14/17 “Won from a double-figure stall” and “Had won at least over 12f before).

That gets us to 3 contenders DRAMATIC QUEEN 25/1, and both the 2 reserves, CYPRESS CREEK 20/1 and PROSCHEMA 20/1

The ideal scenario is that none of the reserves take part and leaves us with a solo trends bet in DRAMATIC QUEEN at 25/1. However, if both the trends picks get in then we can look to the next strongest trend which is 12/17 “Carried 9-1 or less” – that would give us a sole qualifier in PROSCHEMA, so keep an eye on non-runners would be my advice, back DRAMATIC QUEEN and look to follow up with PROSCHEMA if it takes part. 

Sunday Pontefract Ratings

Sunday Pontefract Ratings

The new FTS Ratings have been on fire since being implemented just over a month ago. First we showed a +54pts profit during Galway and Glorious Goodwood, including a +28pts profit and a 215% on the Saturday where Stewards Cup winner Khaadem was advised at 10/1. Then today we showed a huge +41pts profit and 219% Yield thanks to wins for Growl at 9/1 and Dakota Gold at 8/1, amongst others. The Top-Rated runners are performing with amazing consistently.

You can join now and receive all the ratings through the week, including Best Bets advice, all provided instantly, via WhatsApp, usually the day before racing, direct to your phone. I only rate Class 3 contests or better, occassionally a decent Class 4 contest, but never lower than that as then you have issues with consistency.

Join Now

Next week sees the start of the York Ebor meeting where I am expecting more substantial profits and am sure the Ebor winner will be high-rated on the ratings, the ratings model improves and learns with each race rated, no need to look at sectional figures or stride patterns, which many see as the next great thing, but actually just add more confusion and muddy the waters.

I've been rating races for the best part of 20+ years and these new FTS ratings are by far and away the most consistent I've produced at finding regular strong favourites, mixed with value-priced winners.

*UPDATE – New Value Odds and Value % Figures now available on ratings*

I've got an example of a couple of races at Pontefract tomorrow, sadly there are no strong selections as there were today or during Goodwood but they give you an idea of where the value may lie, and what favourites may be worth opposing.

PONTEFRACT 2:30

JABBAAR 7/1 and FINAL 8/1 only have 1pt separating them and it's hard to choose between them so I'd probably favour a split stakes approach, with slightly more on the top-rated. Busy Street is next best on the ratings and could surprise them both but I've learned to trust the ratings and not stray too far, unless the odds warrant it. Ultimately, it looks like the favourite Hereby is worth opposing as it's quite far behind the others on the raw figures.

=========

PONTEFRACT 3:30

Almost a carbon copy of the previous race, although this time, the market seems to have things right with SHADES OF BLUE 7/2 and TAPISSERIE 9/2 only separated by 1pt, this time though there is enough of a gap to suggest that they will have this between them. There are three schools of thought here, first, we could go with the slightly better value on Tapisserie. Secondly, we could just trust in SHADES OF BLUE. The other option is to use one of the selections as a cover bet for the other. So you could stake 1pt on TAPISSERIE and 4pts on SHADES OF BLUE. Ultimately, the ratings are there for subscribers to use as they please. For subscribers tomorrow I would advise no bet in this race and the split stakes on the Top-2 in the 2:30.

We can also see that TAPISSERIE is marginally the better value call on the new V% figures.

I hope you can see the benefit of these ratings, they will transform your betting and below are the type of advise you will receive via WhatsApp. Get on board in time for the York Ebor meeting and you will not be disappointed.

 

Shergar Cup Ratings & Bets

Shergar Cup Ratings & Bets

The Shergar Cup is often treated with disdain by racing ‘purists' but it's a fun day out for many, we even had a FormBet raceday there a few years back, made some money and had a good time.

I've decided to post the main FTS Rating for each race of the Shergar Cup, including which team/jockey would end up with the most points on the day. The ratings can be used to determine decent win selections in each race, and I've given a few points, although the final selections are for the sole viewing of FTS Private Subscribers, but you can of course use the ratings how you please. The POWer rating is a backup rating to use for additional confirmation or high POW-Rated, value bets.

You can join for £30 per month here and get ratings and Best Bet selections each day via WhatsApp, there are an additional 8 races rated away from Ascot today. We showed a +54pts profit and over 100% Yield for all Goodwood and Galway bets last week including winners at 33/1, 10/1, 8/1, 11/2, 9/2 and many more at shorter odds.

Onto the Shergar Cup races at Ascot on Saturday, you can skip to the summary at the bottom if you just want the bets.

Ascot 1:05 With Jamie Kah (Final Venture 7/1) and Hayley Turner's (Lancelot Du Lac 14/1) rides in the Top-4 of the ratings, they should grab some points here. However, both Gerald Moss (Danzeno 3/1) and Adrie De Vries (Corinthia Knight 13/2) could also get some points and sneak the win. I just favour the girls here.

Ascot 1:40 This looks good for Europe with Filip Minarik (What A Welcome 7/1) and Gerald Moss (Time To Study 10/1) in the Top-2 of the FTS. Next best is probably Great Britain and Ireland rider Jamie Spencer (Alfredo 16/1) who has some each-way appeal and Nanako Fujita (Blue Laureate 7/1) able to get some points for the girls. I'd expect Europe to increase their advantage after this race with some more points for the girls as well to hold onto 2nd.

Ascot 2.15 You don't often get this many horses tied for 2nd so this could be trappy but no arguing that Hayley Turner (Melting Dew 8/1) could again figure and get some girl points. However, the Rest of the World have all 3 of their riders in those tied on 2nd and could get off the mark. It's worth noting Filip Minarik's name appearing again (Mandarin 5/1) who is 2nd on FTS and POW as well as Adrie De Vries POW1 runner (Restorer 14/1). The girls may close the gap slightly on Europe but that could be cancelled out by Europe's strongly rated contenders. Trappy race.

Ascot 2:50 This may be booked for the Rest of The World, in particular Vincent Chak-Yiu Ho (Power of Darkness 4/1). Adrie De Vries (Original Choice) name appears again for Europe with ROW's Mark Zahra (Breden 12/1). ROW's Yugo Kawada (Zwayyan 8/1) could also get some points as could Jamie Kah (Another Batt 7/1). This could go to the Rest of the World with some points for Europe and the girls.

Ascot 3:25 Tadhg O'Shea (Vivid Diamond 4/1) could get some much needed, although likely too late, points for GB & Ireland and Danny Tudhope (Boerhan 9/1) may also sneak some points. However, it's Hayley Turner (Sapa Inca 11/2) again that could win this as there is litle to separate them on FTS and she tops the POW ratings. Mark Zahra (Never Do Nothing 5/1) can also sneak some points for ROW.  I'd just favour GB & IRE here for points although a win for Hayley could swing it the girls way.

Ascot 4:00 A Jamie Spencer (Victory Day 5/2) and Hayley Turner (Pass The Vino 5/1) matchup here backed up by ROW's Mr Ho (Magical Wish 12/1) and Jamie Kah (Junius Brutus 12/1) for the girls. I think it's hard to get away from Spencer's mount but a strong showing from the girls and Turner could surprise.

SUMMARY

I see this as a 2-horse race for the outright title. I expect Europe to get off to a strong start in the first few races with the girls following closely behind, then both GB & Ireland and Rest of the World splitting points in the next few races. The key will be the final 2 races, where I don't expect Europe to get too many points and my idea of the winning team, THE GIRLS 3/1 could get decent points in both the final 2 races and head Europe, with GB & IRE finishing strongly up the rail.

1 THE GIRLS

2 EUROPE

3 GB & IRELAND

4 REST OF THE WORLD

 

In terms of individual riders, it's hard to get away from HAYLEY TURNER 6/1, from a pure ratings perspective and perfect timing during a week there has been a lot of talk about female riders, allowances and competing on equal terms. I expect them to ram certain sexist pundits comments down their throats. Another worth looking at, from an each-way perspective, is ADRIE DE VRIES 12/1 who has a number of decent, high-rated bookings for Europe.

Finding More Winners Using GeeGeez Gold

Finding More Winners Using GeeGeez Gold

If you are not using GeeGeez Gold for your horse racing analysis, you are seriously missing out. Other packages like Proform will cost you over £1200 a year – yes, a year(!), compared to the equally feature-rich and far more user-friendly GeeGeez Gold at £297 a year, with the first month trial only £1. That will save you close to £1000 a year, enough for a decent betting bank.

You can build systems and customise your own ratings as you please, GeeGeez also included Racing Post RPR and Topspeed figures alongside Peter May's Speed figures. Matt at GeeGeez is constantly adding new functionality and records detailed and informative videos detailing how to get the best out of the software.

Yesterday at York, you could have found 2 well-backed winners with FIRST ELEVEN (available at 11/2 early on) and SPACE BLUES (available at 7/1 the previous evening) simply by looking at the breeding (they both had the best sire stats in their respective races) and the trainer/jockey form recently, at the course and the Trainer/Jockey Combo figures (screenshots below). As well as a few other pointers like First Eleven dropping in class (down arrow) and Charlie Appleby's record with first-time handicappers, evidenced by the HC pointer.

I prefer to compare all the stats of all runners in a race, but for those looking for a quick selection – these highlighted positives are a real time-saver, and money saver – along with the Instant Expert, PACE and DRAW data. You can perform as much, or as little analysis, as you like – depending on how much time you have available to you.

They also have a full formbook, horse tracker, customised reporting, odds comparison and a £100 free tipping league for subscribers.

So, there is no point signing up to inferior, or the more expensive, flashy services. Save yourself some time, money and take out a 1-month trial to GeeGeez Gold today for just £1, it will transform your betting and help to grow your betting bankroll.

 

MLB Pitchers & Batters – Mon 6th May

MLB Pitchers & Batters – Mon 6th May

Choosing between the 5 elite pitchers, JACOB DE GROM, BLAKE SNELL, MAX SCHERZER, GERRIT COLE and COLE HAMELS is no easy task tonight. They are all priced at 10k+ on Draftkings – Cole and Hamels look to be in potentially the best spots tonight. Hamels is in a great spot against a Miami offense that struggled for power and strikes out 23% of the time. Snell is ab elite leftie and has an excellent record pitching at home but has the low average innings pitched from the 5.  Scherzer is in a tricky spot against a Milwaukee team with a lot of power while DeGrom may struggle to get run support. Gerrit Cole is the one I favour against Kansas City and they have a +2.9 Run advantage tonight. CC SABATHIA is of interest of those a little further down the pricing and I'll probably mix and match these 3. For Batters I really like MOOKIE BETTS who can take advantage of John Means in a good spot. MICHAEL CHAVIS, J.D. MARTINEZ and XANDER BOGAERTS appeal to complete a 4-man Boston stack. I also like the Chicago Cubs batters in a good matchup against Sandy Alcantara, in particular JAVIER BAEZ, KRIS BRYANT and ANTHONY RIZZO. Cleveland Lefties are worth noting against Ivan Nova who struggles against them. FRANCISCO LINDOR and JOSE RAMIREZ are interesting. Finally, 3 from St Louis Cardinals, PAUL GOLDSCHMIDT, PAUK DEJONG and MATT CARPENTER are worth going with against Vince Velasquez. So, I'll mix up those 3 pitchers with the above 4 ‘stacks' and then throw in some value players in the other positions using my ratings, which you can receive by signing up on the homepage.
Flat Racing – Where, and When, the Draw Actually Matters

Flat Racing – Where, and When, the Draw Actually Matters

The result of the 2000 Guineas produced quite a few tweets from supposed ‘experts' about their being a track bias, simply because the first 2 home were drawn 17 and 19 in a 19-runner race. It was another great example of recency bias, with people overreacting to a recent event, or not backing the winner, or perhaps both. There was actually no ‘rail' or ‘track' bias in that race. The first two home simply tracked the leader into the final furlong, Shine So Bright, ridden by a jockey who loves to ride prominently in Silvestre De Sousa, as pointed out in this excellent Jockey Pace Profiles article on GeeGeez by Dave Renham.

The winner was also a Group 1 winning colt, well-bred, from a stable who can farm this race, who raced up with the pace. The fact is that the 3rd, 4th and 5th were drawn 3-1-5. Some people poo-pooed the form, simply because the 2nd was low on official ratings, however these ratings are based on a limited number of runs most of the time, horses can improve markedly from 2 to 3 and people are swayed by the below-par performance of horses prominent in the market, notably the favourite Ten Sovereigns who is bred for speed and was a crazy price simply based on that alone. I expect her to drop back in trip.

The ‘bias theory' was blown out of the water by the next day's 1000 Guineas where the first 5 were drawn 4-8-6-7-1 and the Group-winner made virtually all, again those drawn low benefiting this time from being where the pace was throughout. I actually backed Just Wonderful based on stats, breeding and her run can be marked up, after missing the break, being given a lot to do, wandering, running green and being closest at the finish from stall 15. She will be of interest in the Oaks, although that awkward head carriage and wandering would be a concern, headgear may help.

I largely discount the draw and pace from most of my pre-race analysis, apart from getting a sense of how a race ‘may' be run but here is the thing, a bit like stock-market trading, past performance is no guarantee of future success. Front-runners can blow the start, particularly in sprint races, riding instructions and style of jockey can change race to race and we can never tell how even, or uneven, a tracks watering policy is.

There are far more relevant stats like breeding, trainer course and recent form, jockey style and the horse's suitability to conditions, course, going, distance, class that are far more important to examine than the actual draw itself, which is more chaotic and cannot be accurately predicted, apart from by a few ‘experts' or ‘sectional analysts' AFTER the event, which is of no use in the future as every race is a unique event with different horses, course configurations, going, trainer form varies etc etc.

Some of my best returns over the years have come on supposedly ‘badly' drawn horses who have more in their favour and what turns out to be a ‘bad' or ‘good' draw pre-race is actually no such thing if the pace is favoured where your selection is running – that cannot be accurately predicted so it's best avoided in most race analysis.

There are of course a few exceptions…

CHESTER 5f SPRINTS

Perfect timing for this analysis with Chester May festival starting this week.

Low draws in Chester 5f sprints are often considered gold dust, however, the market has caught onto this anomoly and I believe a lot of runners from Stall 1 in sprints at Chester, either don't have a front-running profile to take advantage of this ‘actual' bias, or simply blow the start.

Backing Stall 1 blindly in 5f sprints with 6+ runners at Chester is a road to the poor house as you can see from this chart from the excellent GeeGeez Gold Query Tool -:

Now, if we look at stall 2 at Chester in 5 sprints we can see things are a little different, perhaps able to sit in just behind the pace, or get to the front over Stall1. The overall strike-rate is better and they are profitable, although the last 2 years have seen a reduction in profitability.

Let's take a look at the actual record of Stall 1 and Stall 2 in 5F sprints since 2009, focusing on the GeeGeez pace scores.

We can see that front-runners that produce a pace score of 4.00 at Chester from both stall 1 and stall 2 are highly profitable.

First the pace figures of stall 1 and we can see that those that make all have a 36% strike-rate with a +43pts profit, ROI of 86% and an A/E of 1.62 indicating that they win 62% more often than their odds suggest, with a huge Impact Value of 3.09. All other runners are unprofitable, indicating that a horse NEEDS to make all from stall 1 to be profitable, so you better be sure of this pre-race.

Now, lets look at Stall 2 over 5f at Chester -:

We can see that the strike-rates of those with a pace figure of 2 and 3 exceed those with the same pace figure from Stall 1 in these races. They are also profitable and it's notable that a runner drawn in Stall 2 that makes all, actually has a higher strike-rate of 46%, higher ROI of 102%, A/E of 2.07 and Impact Value of 4.02.

So, it's worth taking a look at just some of these winners from Stall 1 and 2 that produced a pace figure of 4 when winning.

We can see the biggest profits came in 2014 (54% S/R) and 2018 (50% S/R). Lets examine these winners a little closer. Of the 6 winners in 2014, only 2 of them had the highest pace figure in the race pre-race. However, all 6 winners, had the highest pace figure from those drawn in stall 1 or 2.

The results were a bit more mixed last year but 2 of the 4 winners, including the two highest priced, had the highest or joint highest pace figures pre-race.

So, how can we use this at Chester in 5 sprints. Well, there are 2 options as far as I can see it. Now, the following 2 approaches are for those who subsequently made all.

1) BACK the highest pre-race PACE figured runner from Stall 1 and Stall 2 in Chester 5f Sprints

2) BACK the highest PRICED runner from stall 1 or stall 2 in Chester 5f sprints

Here are what the two approaches would have resulted in since 2009 -:

1) 8/19 (43% S/R) with a +24pts profit and 126% Yield

2) 4/19 (21% S/R) with a +13pts profit and 70% Yield

So clearly, a big advantage to backing whichever runner from Stall 1 or 2 records the highest POST-race pace figure. We can probably filter this a bit further by avoiding 2yo races, where there may not be established pace figures, or horses are having their first ever run.

However, we need to be sure that these runners will make all the running, and there is absolutely no guarantee of that. To prove this point, I've looked at ALL the qualifiers that races in 5f sprints at Chester, picked ALL the qualifiers from Stall1 and 2 and compared those with a higher pace figure PRE-race to those with a lower figure pre-race, since 2015.

HIGHEST PRE-RACE PACE FIGURE 15/66 (23% SR), -3.92pts, -6% Yield
LOWEST PRE-RACE PACE FIGURE 20/66 (30% SR), +30.86pts, +47% Yield

So, this is a fairly small sample size BUT we can see that perhaps too much emphasis is placed on the higher pre-race PACE figure in 5 sprints at Chester. Not only is the strike-rate higher but the profit is significantly better.

There is also too much emphasis placed on the lower stalls at Chester, and ignoring a strong pace runner. For example, I looked at the highest PACE runner in the entire race, where there were two tied on the same pace figure, I broke them by draw – the highest paced-lowest drawn runner and the highest paced-highest drawn runner.

HIGHEST PACE – LOWEST DRAW 4/66 (6% S/R) -36.42pts -55% Yield
HIGHEST PACE – HIGHEST DRAW 10/66 (15% S/R) +24.45pts +47% Yield

CHESTER SUMMARY

Stall 1 and 2 do well at Chester in 5f sprints, but we should pay more attention to the lowest PACE runner pre-race of those from stall 1 or 2 and perhaps be wary of short-priced runners in stall 1.

Similarly, we should be contrarian and ignore the draw, considering the highest PACED runner in these races. in the event of more than one qualifier, give preference to the highest-drawn runner, as they will often go off at a value price. Occasionally, these two methods will produce the same selection, but not often.

You could back qualifiers using these two approaches in Chester 5f sprints and show over +50pts profit with a 41% Yield over the last 4 years.

SANDOWN PARK SPRINTS

I thought it would be interesting to look at this approach at a few other tracks that favour low-drawn runners in sprints, starting with Sandown. Stall 1 and 2 in 5f sprints at Sandown both show a 17% win strike-rate, 39% place record and are profitably backed blindly. This outperforms other stalls in these races by quite some way, apart from an anomaly in stall 8 due to a big priced winner or two.

What is interesting with Sandown, when we look at just stall 1 and 2 in sprints, is the performance of those the subsequent PACE scores. Real hold-up runners (pace score of 1) from these two stalls may struggle at Sandown with just a 7% S/R, but those who race in-behind (pace score of 2) beat those who race prominently (pace score of 3) who in turn outperform front-runners (pace score of 4). It makes sense due to the uphill finish at the course, where front-runners may tire quicker than those given cover and produced with a late run from just in behind the pace. However, if you just avoid those real hold up runners from stall 1 and 2, then it's likely you could show a profit.

So let's have a look at these Stall 1/2 runners in more detail in Sandown sprints. Now, to save some time I've only looked at the winners since 2015 but it's interesting. Chester has shown us that for stalls 1 and 2, you may wish to consider the lower-paced runner from the pair, which perhaps goes against a bit of the crowd who think they need to get to the front early.

Similarly with the Stalls 1 and 2 at Sandown, and a lower pace figure recorded, holding sway, you may think it be best to have a lower PACE figure pre-race, when in actual fact it's not the case.

Now bearing in mind, we are looking at the winners only since 2015, it's interesting that when choosing between the two then the lowest pace runner would have a 50% record (12/24) while the highest pace runner would have a 65% record (16/24). The disparagy is because there are instances where they have the exact same pace figure but the lowest pace runner gives us +47pts profit (195%) while the highest gives us +65pts (272%) – bearing in mind these are just winners we are looking at.

 

GOODWOOD SPRINTS

Goodwood is another track where in sprints it pays to be drawn low, this time I'll look at both 5f and 6f sprints. The bottom 2 stalls are profitable but not quite as much as the other 2 tracks, stall 1 has a 14% S/R (14% Yield), stall 2 has a 13% S/R (4% Yield).

So let's focus on the bottom 2 stalls there over 5f and 6f and look at what PACE scores the winners produce.

An interesting conundrum here. While hold-up runners have the highest Yield at 40%, those that have a pace figure of 2 in the race have a poor 4.73% strike-rate and lose a ton. This is where GeeGeez Gold comes into it's own as we can look at the winners that recorded a pace figure of 1 and see that the results are skewed by a 100/1 2yo winner back in 2017, otherwise they would be running at a loss. So, I would say the pace figure of 3 & 4 are the most relevant, indicating a favouring for prominent or front-runners drawn in the stalls 1 or 2 at Goodwood over 5f and 6f sprint trips.

So I looked back at all the winners since 2014 from stalls 1 and 2 to see if a higher or lower pace figure was favoured. Fact is that there was not much in it with lower pre-race pace horses from stall 1 or 2 having a 53% S/R with a +192pts profit and 481% Yield and higher pre-race pace horses having a 63% S/R with a +207pts profit and 518% Yield. Both approaches found the 100/1 winner, simply because both horses in stall 1 and 2 were in a 2yo race and unraced so would both be backed. Even without that big-priced winner we are looking at +93pts or +108pts profit  with 240% Yield or 278%, which is highly respectable. I would just favour the extra 10% strike-rate and 37% Yield of looking at those with the highest pre-race PACE figure.

OVERALL SUMMARY

Ultimately, you should discount the draw at most tracks, apart from the few cases mentioned above, it's far too overplayed and given far more significance pre-race than it should be by supposed experts and pundits to try to sound clever. Similarly, you should also pay less attention to PACE figures pre-race and perhaps look at other factors when analysing a horse race. The crowd is latching onto DRAW and PACE nowadays but they are often reflected in the odds and are overplayed as a significant factor in analysing the likely winner of a horse race. Pay more attention to breeding, horse form and suitability to current race conditions, trainer recent and course form and less-so for jockeys as any jockey can win, or lose a race, on any given day, given the right circumstances.

Making a profit in horse racing involves being contrarian, considering value and other more predictable factors than draw and pace, which are overplayed.

Follow the following at the following 3 tracks -:

CHESTER 5F SPRINTS

1) Back the horse with the LOWEST pre-race PACE figure from stall 1 and 2.
2) Back the HIGHEST PACE figure runner, where ties, select the one from the HIGHEST DRAW.

Sandown 5F SPRINTS

1) Back the horse with the HIGHEST pre-race PACE figure from stall 1 and 2.

Goodwood 5F and 6F SPRINTS

1) Back the horse with the HIGHEST pre-race PACE figure from stall 1 and 2.

You can perform all this research and more using GeeGeez Gold and add in watchlists, ratings and filters using the Query Tool to automatically flag your own system qualifiers. Get a 1-Month trial for £1 below.